| | Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
A new set of figures about spend on external advisers is released by the UK government and in no time at all we've got national newspapers bemoaning the waste of taxpayers' money and the outrageous daily rates being paid to consulting | |
|
| | gurus.
Reading the latest Scotsman and Independent articles it's hard not to be equally appalled. Where's the balance in these pieces, the journalistic integrity? In one there's a quote from an MP outraged at the government spending £1,000 an hour on | |
|
| | consulting gurus. Sorry - £1,000 an hour? On which planet?!
In the other the £2,000+ daily rates of some consultants are compared with the "daily earnings" of other professionals. A top lawyer, for example, can expect to be paid £1,200 a day. The implication | |
|
| | being how can these consultants possibly be worth £2,000+? The only problem is the apples & pears nature of the comparison. The lawyer actually has take home pay of £1,200 a day, whereas the figure for consultants is their daily billing rate, only a fraction of which will | |
|
| | be their take home pay! But of course, that wouldn't fit the thrust of the article, which is to show consultants in the worst possible light. My take? Success breeds envy...
| |
|