| | By Mick James
As the downturn rumbles along, people are increasingly realising that it’s no longer enough just to batten down the hatches. Consultancies in particular need to take advantage of the opportunities on offer—and to start thinking about the more long-term changes that may be coming in the way they do business.
As Simon Constance of HR consultants Orion puts it, “it hasn’t been the end of the world. Change throws up the opportunity to support clients who’ve had to rethink their entire operating model or deal with change.”
He’s also been pleasantly surprised by clients remaining committed to projects that are clearly improving costs or performance.
“People are saying, ‘If you can improve costs or performance in 18 months, I’ll buy it, and find the cash from somewhere’,” he says. “Some very big organisations are even continuing to stay engaged with capital intensive projects—but they need to shorten the payback from three years to 19 months.”
What has been interesting and encouraging though are signs of clients buying consultancy in a much smarter way, particularly in Orion’s area of specialisation.
“There’s a demand for the HR function to deliver an impact as the result of any change,” says Constance. “We’ve seen the setting up of a lot of shared services functions and that was a simple cost reduction play. Now they’ve started to value it as a creative tool, to take | |
|
| | all that data they have through the HR function and start to do things that make a difference to the business—for example lowering absence levels, taking the cost out but not the resource.”
Constance says he was expecting people to stop buying from Orion’s capacity practice but instead they are continuing to invest in HR skills, such as workforce planning.
“People are saying ‘I don’t want to go through a business transformation, but can you take the people I’ve got and upgrade their skills in six to eight month?’ You’re seeing a lot in the press now about how people are avoiding redundancies, there’s a lot of HR innovation.”
But Constance is also noticing a change in the way people are buying consultancy, moving way from buying big teams and instead using their own spare capacity supplemented with very specific consultancy skills.
“It’s a challenge to the industry and more widespread than people acknowledge,” he says. “Big change projects are typically run by someone who used to be in a big consultancy firm. They need to run a big project but only need five or 10 outside resources for a team of 50. But they know exactly what they want and are prepared to pay decent money for it.”
This has meant that Orion has had to engage in a far more open and granular way with clients, which can leave them feeling “quite naked.”
“We’ve been asked to unpack our intellectual property (IP) in very | |
|
| | particular ways, and put all of our ‘crown jewels’ on the table,” he says. “But clients aren’t going to run off with your IP—they’re never going to do an HR transformation again.”
Nor is he worried about them doing it alone.
“There’s no substitute for experience,” he says. “The client can understand your tools, they can engage with them but they are not seeing all the rabbit holes, because they don’t do this every day.”
This trend, Constance thinks, plays to the strength of the specialist consultancy.
“It gives us a much clearer proposition as a specialist; we’re not bidding to do 10 things of which we’re good at seven,” he says. “Lots of people are good at change—we differentiate ourselves by being good at HR.”
The value of the knowledge transfer will often be that clients can take the lessons learned into other departments, which would threaten a more generalist consultancy. But Orion is very clear about where its heart lies.
“At a personal level our passion is for HR, it’s based on a belief in the power of HR rather than wanting the chance to transform a back office function,” says Constance. “Again and again we are seeing HR being active in step change—you’ve got to believe when you’re going at it with that passion that you’re going to be able to put HR departments back in the thick of it.” | |
| |