| Choosing clients that are going to help build a healthy future is important for firms and individual consultants. Malcolm Sleath from coaching consultancy 12boxes suggests there are strategies to be learned from Napoleonic surgeons and cynical psychiatrists. |
| How to pick clients |
| |
|
| | By Malcolm Sleath
Question: What is the best business development strategy in an economic downturn?
Answer: Professional success is not always the result of hard work, dedication and competence. The reputations of consultancies and consultants are often hostage to the fortunes of their past and present clients. People seem to place more emphasis on the prestige of the organisations for which the consultancy was carried out than they do on the value delivered.
In the medical profession, the cynical exploitation of this phenomenon is summed up in the quip: “A good psychiatrist is one who picks patients who are going to get well”.
It draws on the idea that a proportion of people with mental illness are always going to get better without any medical intervention whatsoever. So a cynical psychiatrist might work to ensure that his or her patient list includes a higher proportion of such people than the lists of other psychiatrists by finding ways to deter those with a less promising prognosis.
If successful, the payoff from this strategy will be an enhanced reputation for success in the eyes of patients and administrators (although not necessarily in the eyes of fellow psychiatrists). Could similar considerations apply to consulting? If so, how should they be taken into account when deciding a business development strategy for the current economic climate?
In a recession, it is | |
|
| | tempting to seek work from sources that are publicly funded, particularly if the recession is going to be long and hard, and public sector programmes seem buoyant. But it is worth asking what value will be placed on such a portfolio when the public sector borrowings have to be paid back and budgets are trimmed, if not slashed. Will the hard-won experience be seen as relevant in the market place in three to five years? Or will it be seen as yesterday’s solutions to yesterday’s problems? This is a time when it is all too easy to plump for safe options, which turn out not to be safe at all.
At the very least, it may be better to balance pursuit of the remaining big budgets by building relationships with the clients who are going to be seen to succeed in the post-recessionary period. But will these clients be prepared to spend any money in the short term?
Certainly not in the way they have done in the past, but they might be open to propositions that have a significant element of reward contingent on success. In which case, it becomes important to think about to whom such deals should be offered, bringing us back to the strategy adopted by the cynical psychiatrist, or rather to the technique of triage on which it is based.
Triage is thought to be the inspiration of Dominique Jean Larrey, a notable French surgeon who made his reputation in the Napoleonic wars. He realised that on the battlefield, where medical resources were scarce and decisions had to be made quickly, there were going to be casualties who would survive whether they | |
|
| | were treated or not. Others were highly likely to die even with treatment. But for a third group, timely medical intervention would make the difference between life and death, and it was on those casualties that the battlefield surgeons needed to focus their attention.
This is a time when consultants and consultancies who know their industries will be thinking like Napoleonic surgeons and cynical psychiatrists. They will not allow themselves to be distracted by following the crowd in the pursuit of short-term gains, just as surgeon Larrey steeled himself to ignore the cries of those who were going to die anyway. Instead, they will consider which businesses are likely to win through the recession and be in a position to grow afterwards. They will know that among them there will be organisations where the directors and shareholders might be persuaded their chances of winning through would be greatly enhanced by a timely intervention, particularly if it was packaged with an attractive contingency element.
In pursuing these opportunities, consultants and consultancies will balance the need to generate cash now with a focus on developing a healthy client portfolio on which to base strong growth when conditions improve. Future market share will go to those who are associated with success, even if a good deal of it would still have happened anyway without their intervention. | |
| |
| |
|