| | By Mick James
Tony Blair may be back, but is it going to be business as usual after the election? A lacklustre campaign which saw most parties duck the really big issues led to a surprisingly exciting election night. It's a result which can be seen as a success for all the parties. Labour have held onto power with a working majority, the Tories have regained ground and revived morale, and the Lib Dems have achieved another high-water mark.
How this will translate into the day-to-day business of government is fascinating to predict. Labour's majority is still just about large enough for them to carry on as if nothing had happened, although they'll need to be disciplined in the face of a revitalised, two-pronged Opposition. What's more difficult will be negotiating with internal factions. The party has been stripped of some of its more Blairite newcomers, and Labour backbenchers will be eager to flex their muscles. This could have major consequences for plans for further reform in health, education and | |
| |
| | largely unnoticed line in the Labour manifesto also promised to use public procurement “under EU rules” to safeguard UK jobs. This could be bad news for offhsorers hoping to pick up public sector work (and for government departments hoping to use this obvious route to save money).
So far in government Labour has been reasonably consultant-friendly. According to figures from the Management Consultancies Association spending on consultants has risen from £217m to £1.3bn since 1997. With experienced figures from consultancy in both government and administrative posts, the administration is well aware of the advantages and pitfalls of using consultants. It certainly won't do anything as ham-fisted as the Conservative pledge (based on the James Review, compiled by people who really should know better) to simply slash £500m from government spending on consultancy.
However there has definitely been a new "get-tough" approach to procurement which has been hard on long-term suppliers and made it | |
|
| | hard to make money on government contracts.
This may make for some lean times ahead. Most commentators agree that this will not be an administration with much time for grand projects. A lot of energy will be going into internal debate as the succession to Tony Blair is decided, and there'll be desire simply to keep things on an even keel with an eye on the fourth term.
At the same time, there are worrying signs in the economy, with oil price rises beginning to fuel inflation, and consumer confidence evaporating. On the public finance side, Gordon Brown faces not one but several "black holes". His own plans to grow spending are based on growth assumptions that few outside observers would endorse, and there are a number of structural time-bombs. In the days before the election, some truly worrying figures about public sector pensions came out. Public sector pension costs are rising so fast that in some areas they are more than swallowing up increases in expenditure. None of the parties picked up on this in the campaign. That's probably because | |
|
| | no-one has ever had a clue what to do about it, preferring to pass the parcel to future administrations. This process could be coming to a rapid and sticky end, with Labour facing an unenviable choice between reneging on promises to public sector workers or jacking up taxes.
If all this comes true, the consultancy industry should start panicking. In previous recessions, the public sector could always be relied on to come to the rescue of the industry. This time round it simply isn't going to happen. If the worst case scenario--a return to Seventies-style "stagflation"--occurs, the impact on the industry could be severe indeed. Are you ready to face declining order books and mounting staff costs? It could happen sooner than you think.
All views expressed in this article are those of Mick James and do not necessarily reflect the views of Top-Consultant.com and Consulting-Times.com
Contact Mick with your views or suggestions at: mick.james@top-consultan t.com
| |
|