| | It is a long held truism that the most complex projects, prestigious clients, rigorous methodologies and quality of training are the preserve of the large, established players in the consulting world. But there are now significant numbers of established, smaller firms, usually tightly focused on a specific sector or functional area, who are successfully challenging perceptions on all these | |
|
| | fronts and also offering first class career alternatives.
Whilst for many of the big players regulatory and structural issues, combined with the economic downturn, meant that 2001-2003 was a lean time, many smaller organisations continued to prosper and grow during this period.
Often set up by Principals with a 'blue chip' consulting background, they put forward quality of | |
|
| | experience, rigorous sector and/or functional expertise and flexible and cost effective delivery, which proved a winning combination for clients. Equally, for their staff this represented the 'icing on the cake' in addition to the traditional benefits of moving to a smaller environment - a reduction in bureaucracy and the opportunity for increased personal responsibility. Trading off quality of clients and projects was no | |
|
| | longer necessary to enjoy these benefits and there was the opportunity to focus explicitly on areas of business consulting that were diminishing in profile within some of the larger players as they focused on ever larger projects, often based around outsourcing or technology propositions.
Smaller firms with quality propositions needed fewer clients to remain committed to projects in order to | |
|
| | grow successfully and enable them to buck the economic trend. Now that we have moved to a more positive point in the cycle, with the established players again looking to hire, they represent a real and valid career alternative for all levels of consultant.
The message seems clear and consistent. Size no longer matters!
| |
|