| | By Mick James
One is so used to thinking of consultancy as a “young” industry that it comes as something of a shock to learn that the Management Consultancies Association is celebrating its 50th anniversary. Perhaps this is a tribute to the fact that whenever I encounter the MCA it seems to be in a near-continuous process of reinvention. This is not a criticism—I feel this is the only appropriate mode for the trade association of the consultancy industry, which itself has roughly the same ability to sit still as a six-year old who’s been told it’s snowing outside.
When the MCA was founded in 1956, the UK consultancy industry was a very different beast. The four founding firms, PA, Urwick Orr, P-E International and Inbucon, between them represented 75% of a UK consultancy industry that was still three years away from seeing its first McKinsey consultant and in which accountancy firms, let alone IT specialists, had yet to make a mark.
Nowadays the MCA is a different organisation for a different industry. McKinsey may still have yet to darken its doors but, despite the twists and turns of the industry, it has always managed to | |
| |
| | balancing act for the MCA to achieve, given the lop-sidedness of an industry which has always been polarised by large numbers of small firms and small numbers of very large firms with precious little in between. If the MCA becomes just a club for the big boys then the smaller consultancies will drift away, while if the concerns of smaller firms dominate then it runs the risk of alienating the core of the industry.
“The MCA has grown significantly over the last two years, and growth is not necessarily the name of the game now in the organisation,” says Hill. “Growth is still on the agenda but it won’t be the 50% expansion of the last couple of years.”
Not that there aren’t big fish out there for the MCA to net. The strategy houses are still playing hard to get, there’s the newly independent AT Kearney and, of course, re-emerging “Big Four” firms KPMG and Ernst & Young. PwC, interestingly enough, has maintained its MCA membership throughout all the upheavals in the sector as, less surprisingly, has Deloitte.
Although the MCA has strict membership criteria, it has always been clear that these | |
|
| | should be dictated by the market. It has revised its rules to recognise the emergence of the IT and outsourcing industries and to recognise that a lot of management consultancy these days is delivered by consultancy arms that are subsidiaries of broader groups.
“No matter what happens to an organisation, the sort of organisations we want to buy into are high quality deliverers of consultancy,” says Hill.
The next area for change for the MCA is to look at what’s happening to the bottom end of the market. The basic criteria for entry to the MCA are: employing a minimum of 10 consultants; having three years of operating accounts; and having at least five client references. Nowadays a “small” firm might employ over 30 consultants, and the MCA is considering raising the bar to take account of this shift in the market.
This does not meant the MCA is turning in on itself. If anything it is more expansive than ever. The Young MCA initiative, for example, has been a roaring success, encouraging networking and socialising between new entrants to consulting and creating a sense of community in the | |
|
| | industry. The MCA is also actively reaching out to other institutes and institutions.
“We are developing a relationship with CIPS (the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply), the people who are purchasing consultancy services,” says Hill. “We’re also in dialogue with the IMC (the Institute of Management Consultants) to see if we can have a triple branded approach to procurement.”
Government is also another long-standing area of, if not outright lobbying, then advice and influence, and the MCA is making slow but steady headway in getting the good news about consultancy out to the media. Its recent survey (carried out by Metra Martech), which found that 90% of private and public sector managers were satisfied with their consultants, was picked up by many of the nationals.
One of the most exciting proposals that the MCA is looking into is creating an alumni network of former MCA consultants who have left the industry. If only a fraction of the potential candidates joined up, that could a very extraordinary network indeed.
| |
|
| | represent the lion’s share of UK consultancy revenues. In recent years the MCA has been on a rapid growth track, growing over 50% in the last two years, from 42 members at the end of 2003 to 65 today.
Last year the MCA’s long-serving executive director, Bruce Petter retired, and the MCA decided that it was now appropriate for the association to be headed by a chief executive. The original choice for the post, corporate lawyer Karen Birch left after a short tenure, but the MCA now has a new CEO in the person of former consultant Peter Hill. So what does he think the future might hold for the MCA?
“I came in with a sense that there’s been a lot of chopping and change in the past year, so there was a need to establish some sort of stability,” he says. “Now we can look at things in terms of defining the MCA as an organisation, of looking at its value in different ways to different sizes of organisation.”
One senses that this will always be a tricky | |
|