|
| | Ever since management consultancy broke on to the world stage in the mid 70s, it has been famous for its high churn rate. Fuelled by aggressive HR techniques such as "Up or Out" or "Grow or Go", average career lengths with any firm were expected to be about two years. A few recruits were asked to stay on to become managers, whilst fewer still were asked to become partners. The majority headed off either to the clients or their competitors to | |
|
| % Respondents By Years of Experience with Current Firm |
| | | |
| < 6 Months |  | 27
16.5
|
| 6 - 12 Months |  | 10.9
13.4
|
| 1 - 2 Years |  | 13.9
15
|
| 2 - 3 Years |  | 14.8
14.9
|
| 3 Years |  | 33.3
40.3
|
|
|
|
- Y2004 | - Y2005 |
|
| Source: Top-Consultant |
|
| | start their corporate careers.
However, for the first time in years, the two year rule has been broken. 55.2% of our respondents have been with their firm for over two years and 40% of consultants have been with their firm for more than three years. So has management consultancy gone soft?
The answer lies in part with the recruitment freezes, which only just began to thaw in 2004. These have now left many of | |
|
| | the firms with a staffing hole, between 1 to 3 years of tenure. Rather than being the core engine of project teams these employees are now the minority - representing under 30% of professional staff. As recruitment picks up this hole will get worse, making the average firm a strange combination of people with 4+ years of experience and rookies.
| |
|
| |
|