| | By Mick James
Times may be getting hard in the UK economy, but I’m still encountering a lot of firms who, if not exactly bullish, are still cautiously optimistic about their growth plans. Many of these are smaller firms, however, who are still growing into their niche, so it was useful to get a perspective from Alan Buckle, head of KPMG’s Global Advisory practice, a 27,000 strong group of which consultancy has been a rapidly growing part.
“We’re still recruiting but it’s very careful and targeted,” he says, although he later explains that this caution is as much determined by the firm’s care of its reputation as the economy.
“We only hire people we expect to succeed,” he says. “In other organisations it’s considered OK to take a chance but, particularly with senior people, we are very careful who we hire.”
“Historically, the consultancy business has followed the economy quite closely with a time lag – but it’s always ‘different this time’,” he says. “Last time we were heavily geared toward things like Oracle and SAP, this time we are much closer to clients and | |
|
| | their agenda, we can see what their plans and priorities are and we are much more flexible.”
This “more people-based, less industrial” KPMG is a result of the firm’s reinvention of itself after its largely involuntary exit from and (according to Buckle) completely involuntary re-entry into the consulting business.
“We had absolutely no intention of building it up again, but clients kept saying ‘we’ve got issues in our supply chain, could one of your chaps come and talk to us, you must have somebody’,” he says. “The market defines the space we work in.”
The result, says Buckle, is a business in which consultancy – although KPMG prefers the term “advisory” believing it to be better understood around the world – is a much better fit with the KPMG brand.
“When we had the consultancy business before we had a lot of ‘Who do we want to be’ type conversations,” he says. “We don’t have those now. People ask us if we are going back into the systems integration business and we say ‘no way’. It’s obvious when you take step back and look at it: you run those | |
| |
| |
This also highlights what Buckle sees as a key differentiator for KPMG: “This is an environment where collaboration is rewarded,” he says. “If you don’t have the ability to work with colleagues there’s a cap on your development – that’s not the case elsewhere.”
Buckle acknowledges that much of KPMG’s growth has come from client pull and the transfer of work back from the systems integrators. But he is also very proud of the firm’s achievement, pointing out that not only have these forces now stabilised, but that a few years ago many thought the Big Four would never make it back into consultancy at all.
“Performance consulting has been built from virtually nothing to a £100m-plus business with 700 consultants,” he says. “We have scaled very fast, and we feel we are now definitely at critical mass.”
A priority now is not just the integration of practices, but the integration of KPMG as a global force.
“It’s something we always beat ourselves up over, but in reality we have no difficulty in putting teams together from, say, South Korea, China and the UK,” says | |
|
| | Buckle. “We talk about ‘the network’ as if it was a bad thing, but we take our strengths for granted.”
What is happening now is that the firm is not only creating more and more international teams but increasingly moving its people around the globe.
“There are constant rotations through Moscow, and we’ve had people take up leadership roles in India and China,” he says. “I think, particularly in a recession, if I was an ambitious 30-something, I’d have to ask myself, am I going to get better experiences in the Middle East or Russia? My tip would be to go and do something overseas for a few years.”
Ultimately, Buckle sees the only constraints on KPMG’s renewed growth as being the brand and its values.
“We have a brand built up over a hundred years and that’s something people sometimes only understand the strength of when they leave us,” he says. “The question is, where does the brand take you? Maybe we work more with the CFO than the CEO – but if I was a systems integrator I would die to work at the CFO level.” | |
|