| | By Mick James
A recent correspondent wonders whether the exodus of consultants from the profession is due purely to work/life balance issues or possibly a deeper malaise. Looking back on his years consulting to the financial sector – he is now a clergyman – he wondered if many consultants did not suffer from a subconscious feeling that their work was at some level “pointless”. After all, years of consulting into the financial services sector has done very little to preserve it from the current forced restructuring.
By coincidence, that weekend I’d been discussing family trees and was struck by how many of our forebears were artisans, tradesmen or worked in family businesses. Despite our Oxbridge degrees and such, it looked, from today’s perspective, a much more solid and comforting existence. That’s why, one of the parents said, the middle classes place so much emphasis on education – it’s the main thing they can pass on.
Unfortunately, acquiring a “good education” places enormous strain on both parents and children, not just financially but ethically. In my day it was possible to attain a pretty good education for pretty much nothing and those few precious years were the opportunity for us deracinated middle-class types to pretty much invent ourselves from whole cloth and to work out what we wanted to “be” when we grew up.
I’ll cross that bridge when I come to it, but I note that for today’s graduates the financial sacrifices and debts are just too great for one’s journey through the education system to be merely a voyage of self-discovery. So a “good” education becomes merely a ticket to a “good” job, with goodness defined in purely financial terms. Small wonder then that consultancy and banking elbowed their way to the top of graduates’ lists | |
|
| | of professions of choice. Great jobs to be sure, but surely not for everybody?
Unfortunately, over the years one begins to feel a bit of a fool for not having parlayed one's brains and qualifications into the biggest pile of cash. And then – should one have any cash – one is made to feel even more of a fool for not parlaying it into even more cash. This brought us to the weird situation where while run-of-the-mill financial products barely outperformed inflation, the wealthy demanded, almost as of right, double-digit returns, preferably tax free. So the financial services industry became ever more skewed towards riskier and more complex schemes and more and more of us became drawn towards the casino.
Inevitably, consultants were drawn into this arena in huge numbers even if only to create the supporting infrastructure and to deal with the consequences of demutualisation, deregulation and endless consolidation. But I’m sure many will be very proud of the projects they have done. While some consultants might feel a sense of despair at all this hard work having been thrown away, many others will be pragmatic enough to see the opportunities involved in resolving the current mess.
Where we go from an ethical point of view is a more difficult question. Given what’s been happening, can consultants simply position themselves as “blunt instruments” and create whatever outcomes their clients ask for? Or is there a wider responsibility?
Of course, management consultants are not strangers to codes of ethics, as we’ve seen in this column many times. But codes of ethics in professional services are largely predicated on protecting the client from the consultant, or dealing with straightforwardly unethical demands. There’s very little that can help with the sort | |
|
| | of systemic failure we’ve seen here.
My correspondent laments the lack of guiding values in the sector and refers with admiration to the sort of solid, Victorian values that underpinned some of the enterprises set up by, for example, Quakers or Methodists. I suspect nowadays it would be hard to gain a consensus around a set of religiously-derived values. However, sustainability is a concept that sits well with many audiences these days – although I do baulk a bit when it takes on a pseudo-religious air.
Nevertheless, more and more of the consultants I speak to are putting a commitment to “sustainable change” at the head of their list of values, and it seems to strike a chord with many clients. Not that that’s much use if the clients are not biting, but there must be an opportunity now, with so much of the financial services industry under government control. The temptation will be, I am sure, to simply offload the stakes to the highest bidder and use the cash to repair the nation’s balance sheet. At which I’m sure many consultants will sigh “here we go again” and pitch into yet another pile of integration work.
An alternative would be to work with consultants who promote “sustainability” above all things to evolve new financial models that answer people’s financial needs, just as our forebears created the building and friendly societies in days gone by. How attractive all those stolid old institutions seem now with their promises to be permanent and prudent and equitable. What the modern equivalents might look like, I’m not sure, nor would I hold out too much hope for this outcome. But the need is there – if I had a child looking for a meaningful future career, I wouldn’t necessarily steer him or her away from financial sector consultancy. | |
| |