|
| | among commentators on the left. Not only do they not have a problem with the country being led for three years by an unelected PM, they are also very comfortable with the idea that he will jettison most of the programme and principles on which the last election was won. Here’s Polly Toynbee from the Guardian: “Expect Him to try to re-establish a firm red line between the culture of the private sector and the culture of public service. It won't be easy. The two have blended together, instead of the public realm being insulated from commerce. Civil servants are distressed by management consultants selling them the same bottle of used snake oil for preposterous fees; or they gasp with envy at the sums paid to business moguls called in to run government functions.”
OK, it was me that capitalised the “Him” but I think it works better with the muddled metaphors and tone of the piece, which sees Gordon sweeping down biblically to cleanse the temple of public service from the evils of the private sector. I | |
|
| | also particularly liked the “same bottle of used snake oil” phrase, and urge all consultants to make sure they only use fresh snake oil from an unopened bottle in future public sector work.
What a wonderful prospect, a public sector free of the contaminating germs of private sector culture. They’ll probably go back to keeping important bits of paper on metal spikes rather than storing data in horrid computers.
More seriously, what this approach would rule out is the current remedial work being carried out by Big Four firms on NHS finances. To recap, following Government commitments which will nearly treble NHS spending compared to when it came into office, NHS finances are in dire straits. A projected £620m deficit is now more like £790m and KPMG hit squads put in last December found that around a fifth of primary care trusts were in serious financial difficulties. I’m not sure where all the money has gone, but the phrase “inflation-proofing NHS pensions” did crop up in my investigations, which must be some consolation to NHS chief exec Sir | |
|
| | Nigel Clear, who is taking early retirement (“not everything has gone well”).
Now the Big Four are happily mopping up the turnaround work and why? Because, according to NHS FD Richard Douglas, the KPMG report revealed that “the capability of the management was inadequate to deal with challenges of their current financial position”. This chimes in neatly with the findings of a recent MCA survey of both public and private sector managers in which 70% said consultants were important because they gave them “access to specific skills not available internally”. Of course, He will put a stop to all that for the public sector managers, widening yet further the deficit of public sector productivity growth compared to the private sector, meaning an ever-increasing tax just to keep up.
Even those private sector firms who eschew consultancy can often hire their way out of a skills and knowledge gap. But the salary-light, pension-heavy reward structure of the public sector militates against any meaningful interchange of staff | |
|
| | with the grubby world of “commerce”. Nor can the public sector gaily traipse off to India to hire the cream of its business graduates for buttons: its back office posts are ring-fenced for shambling malcontents guarded by Unison officials growling “them thurr be Wes Mincer jobs”. Now I’m not arguing that every public sector job should be shipped off to Bangalore so I can spend my council tax on holidays in the Caribbean (not today, anyway). I’d prefer at least a “shape-up or ship out” option. But even I would feel that it would be extremely unfair if He were to cut the public sector off from the very expertise it desperately needs to clean its act up.
I realise I’m being very unfair in all this to Gordon Brown, who, despite his many failings, couldn’t be even half as bad a PM as his acolytes fondly hope he will be. And, like Godot, of course, He may not turn up at all.
| |
|