| | By Mick James
Many things have changed in consulting, but it seems that the mystique of partnership is inextinguishable. A lot of firms that have changed their ownership or governance structures still retain the title, and the trend is now for other players in the market to reintroduce it.
Last year Unisys changed “vice president” to “partner” in its consulting practice. The move was partly to help attract consulting talent and also to signal a renewed assault on the consulting market following the acquisition of KPMG Consulting in Belgium. Now another of the KPMG successor firms, Atos Consulting, has reintroduced partners.
Mark Spears, managing partner in charge of people and change is clear that the move is primarily aimed at clients.
“After KPMG was acquired by Atos Origin the partners assumed the title of managing director, and it really confused people in the marketplace,” he says. “I had to explain to people that I was one of 35 or 40 managing directors.”
Given that the next rung down the ladder consisted of “directors”—now renamed associate partners—you | |
| |
| | related to their role in the business,” he says. “In a traditional partnership it’s a very distinct role—the partner has to generate enough work to keep 25 to 30 people busy.”
By contrast Atos can appoint individuals to partnerships based on a wider understanding of the needs of the business. While the bulk of partners will always be client-facing, there’s no reason why other partners might not focus on business development or HR—traditionally career suicide in a “real” partnership.
“Our partners have to be leaders in our business as well as technically sound people,” says Spears. “Professional management is crucial to firms like ours.”
It’s true that there are a lot of partners in consultancy who owe their position more to technical skill than managerial nous—the Peter Principle applies just as much to consulting as other professions. Partnership appointments are often controversial, but as Spears points out, “that applies to any organisation that’s not got transparency about promotion.”
“One of the things that we’re very conscious of is the need to make it very clear | |
|
| | what qualities you need to move from associate partner to partner level,” he says “We have a structured process to make that step.”
Consulting currently accounts for about 8 per cent of Atos Origin’s revenues, and the company is currently ramping up recruitment, focusing primarily on mature recruits.
“We like to take people from industry with five to ten years' experience and make them into effective consultants,” says Spears. “How can you give advice to clients if you haven’t been on the other side of the desk?”
The reintroduction of the partner title will play a vital role in Atos Consulting’s growth strategy which will position the firm in three ways: 1) to be seen as the consulting “front-end” of the managed operations and systems integration business; 2) as a stand-alone consultancy and 3) as a business able to leverage Atos Origin's existing portfolio.
“How do you get people to see you as a business consultant when they see you as their desktop manager?” Spears says.
The approach is already bearing fruit: Atos built on its desktop management | |
|
| | relationship with United Biscuits to develop business process redesign work for its consultants, which has in turn led to systems integration projects.
“We’re two years into this now,” says Spears. “And it’s a year since the Sema project. We get to talk about our existing clients with 200 account managers and account directors. That’s prime pickings and we hope to generate a significant amount of business there.”
Ultimately Spears hopes that the term partner will be seen as a hallmark of quality assurance.
“It’s all about the quality of relationships, the level of integrity that you’re able to generate. You have to have that level of trust,” he says. “Anyone can call themselves a partner, but they get caught out pretty damn quick when you’re dealing with the sort of clients we talk to.”
All views expressed in this article are those of Mick James and do not necessarily reflect the views of Top-Consultant.com and Consulting-Times.com
Contact Mick with your views or suggestions at: mick.james@top-consultant .com | |
|